Counselor intelligence brief

Young Scientists Journal

A counselor-facing guide to YSJ as a student publication path: what it is, who it suits, what appears in the public archive, and how to submit without losing time to format and fit mistakes.

Snapshot date 2026-05-22. Public article database loading.

1. What is YSJ

Young Scientists Journal is a UK-registered charity and an international, peer-reviewed science journal run by young people for young people. Its own site says it was founded in 2006 at The King's School, Canterbury, and connects students from more than 50 countries.

The counselor read: YSJ is a broad-access publication path for students ages 12 to 20 who want public science writing experience. It is wider than JEI because it accepts original research, review articles, and blog or magazine-style science pieces. That makes it useful for students with a serious research manuscript and also for students whose current work is closer to a literature review or science communication article.

YSJ is the right move when

  • The student is between 12 and 20 at submission.
  • The work is scientific, technical, or science-policy adjacent.
  • The student can wait months while a volunteer journal runs review, editing, and production.
  • A review article or science communication piece is more realistic than a JEI-style original research paper.

YSJ is a weaker move when

  • The student needs the most selective high-school science-journal signal.
  • The piece needs US-style manuscript conventions or fast turnaround.
  • The article is primarily a resume line and the student cannot defend the science in conversation.
  • The student has a completed hypothesis-driven natural-science study that fits JEI cleanly.

2. Eligibility and fit

Use this as a quick counselor screen before a student drafts for YSJ.

Quick fit check

Four questions. No data leaves your browser.

1. Is the student age 12 to 20 at submission?
2. Is the article scientific or technical in substance?
3. Which form best matches the draft?
4. Can the student follow YSJ house rules?

Chicago references, British English spelling, no plagiarism, and patience with a volunteer review process.

Age range12-20At submission
Formats3Research, review, blog
Reference styleChicagoPer YSJ publish page
SpellingBritishThroughout

3. Winners and award-linked examples

YSJ does not publish a single canonical winners archive on its current site. These are public winner or award-linked references that help counselors understand the kinds of recognition connected to YSJ, its conference ecosystem, and partner science-writing opportunities.

YSJ organization award

Science Publication of the Year 2023

SME News listed Young Scientists Journal as the Southern Enterprise Awards 2023 winner for Science Publication of the Year. This is an organizational recognition signal, useful when explaining YSJ's public footprint to families.

View award page
Partner competition

RCSU Science Challenge: Young Scientists Journal question

Imperial College London's RCSU Science Challenge has included a Young Scientists Journal question. Its past-winners page lists named winners and runners-up, including the 2023 YSJ-question winner Sam Fricker.

View past winners
Conference poster winner

YSJ Conference biology poster winner

The Judd School reported that Maximus, a Year 13 student, won the Biology poster competition at the Young Scientists Journal Conference for a Drosophila genetics project on ethanol and sucrose preference.

View school report
Student publication award

ABSW IOP Student Science Publication Award runner-up

IOP Publishing reported that Young Scientists Journal, then associated with Herts and Essex High School, was runner-up for the 2016 ABSW IOP Student Science Publication Award.

View announcement
Special issue selection

Royal Society Partnership Grants special issue

The Royal Society described a 2015 special YSJ issue that showcased selected student studies from Partnership Grants schools. It notes that papers were chosen as the best submissions by a judging panel.

View Royal Society note

Counselor use: treat these as recognition context, not as a ranked list of YSJ's best current articles. For student advising, the stronger question is still whether the student's manuscript fits YSJ's article types and review process.

4. Public article database

Search and filter the public YSJ blog-post sitemap. Categories and article types are inferred when the page lacks a clean field, so treat them as counselor triage labels.

0articles shown
-latest public date
0categories

5. Submission roadmap

  1. Stage 1

    Choose the right article form

    Original research needs a completed study. Review articles need a defensible literature map and student interpretation. Blog or magazine articles need a clear science-communication angle.

  2. Stage 2

    Audit originality and permissions

    YSJ forbids plagiarism. For research manuscripts, check that mentors and co-authors support submission. For reviews, make sure the student is synthesizing sources rather than stitching summaries together.

  3. Stage 3

    Convert to YSJ house style

    Use British English spelling and Chicago-style references. Put this pass before submission, because it changes many small words and citations across the draft.

  4. Stage 4

    Submit through the YSJ form

    The publish page routes submissions to `ysjournal.com`. Save a PDF copy, the submitted document, and the submission timestamp in the student file.

  5. Stage 5

    Prepare for volunteer review

    The published process moves through data check, junior editor review, academic advisor review, senior editor review, and production. YSJ warns that publication can take months.

6. Common pitfalls

Submitting a generic school essay

YSJ can publish broad science writing, but the article still needs a claim, sources, and technical substance.

Ignoring British English

Do the spelling pass before final citation cleanup so the manuscript reads as one piece.

Weak Chicago references

Students used to MLA or APA often leave mixed citation traces. Make one reference-style pass near the end.

Overclaiming prestige

Frame YSJ as a public, peer-reviewed youth science publication and writing experience. Avoid claiming database indexing unless YSJ documents it.

Using AI carelessly

The student should be able to explain every claim, source, and revision choice. Use AI for coaching and checking, then have the student own the final manuscript.

Choosing YSJ when JEI fits better

If a middle or high school student has a completed hypothesis-driven natural-science study with a senior author, JEI may carry a stronger signal.